• Riggs Borre ha inviato un aggiornamento 1 mese fa

    what’s webhard?

    When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn’t enough to stream.

    Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

    When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

    Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

    File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).


    It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

    In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

    Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.

    You must share a URL which means you can’t share music files or videos.

    According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It’s even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It’s much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

    It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it’s the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it’s often cut off at that point)

    It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

    You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.

    Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it’s in that state, you must find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

    The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

    Google Drive

    It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

    It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

    It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

    If you don’t upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn’t bother me.

    There are the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It’s a tiny problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it’s the best in the desktop environment.

    Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

    There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it isn’t stipulated by company policy.

    If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)


    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It’s the best in the world with regards to media reading.

    There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.

    The speed is relatively good. It’s a lot faster than the Box and doesn’t work with Google Drive.

    The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from the free account may be the largest. 300MB.

    The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It’s practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

    The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

    Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards…

    You will find a saying that changes in documents can’t be reflected instantly when working on documents.

    Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.

    The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

    There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

    Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

    File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

    노제휴 웹하드 Slow. Not paid people.

    Media access is very disadvantageous. It’s a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

    The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

    Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it’s better than Dropbox, but it’s significantly less than Google Drive).

    It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***


    The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

    The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it’s not that strong a difference.

    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.